Skip to content
Bay Area Architect Architects ranked by permits
Who to call firstWho to call

Contractor, San Francisco License 306094

Field Construction Inc.

The city has issued 373 of the 379 San Francisco building permits that name Field Construction Inc. since 2018. The work is mostly commercial, led by offices. Their median plan-review permit for offices took 4.2 months from filing to issue, about the same as the citywide median. Their busiest neighborhoods are Financial District/South Beach, South of Market and Chinatown.

Also filed as
designer
Issued by the city
373 of 379 filed since 2018
Median plan-review time, offices
4.2 mo city median 3.9 mo
Rank for offices
No. 9 of 94 by offices issued
Overall rank
No. 16 of 226 contractors

What they work on

Every San Francisco building permit with Field Construction Inc. on the record since 2018, by project type. Most filed: 340 offices, 20 apartments and multifamily, 9 restaurants and bars.

Residential and commercial, by permits filed

5% residential
95% commercial
Permits by project type, filed and issued
  1. Offices Commercial 334 of 340 issued 90% of filings.
  2. Apartments and multifamily Residential 20 of 20 issued 5% of filings.
  3. Restaurants and bars Commercial 9 of 9 issued 2% of filings.
  4. Retail and shops Commercial 7 of 7 issued 2% of filings.
  5. Hotels, clinics, schools and other commercial Commercial 3 of 3 issued 1% of filings.

Permits over time

Permits filed each year, drawn as a street with one building per year, and how many of all their permits the city has issued.

Busiest year
2018
69 permits filed
Latest filing
Oct 2026
98% of 379 issued
Permits filed per year: 2018: 69, 2019: 56, 2020: 45, 2021: 21, 2022: 34, 2023: 12, 2024: 30, 2025: 61, 2026: 51. The 2026 figure runs through October 20, 2026.

One building per year, its height the permits filed. Each floor line marks 10 permits; the 2026 building is dashed because it counts permits filed through October 20, 2026.

Issued by the city: 373 of 379 permits filed

98%

All San Francisco project permits since 2018 in this data

93% issued

6 not issued as of October 20, 2026. Source: SF Department of Building Inspection permits via DataSF.

How fast their permits come through

Filing to issue for permits that went through plan review. Field Construction Inc. has 9 of those across all project types; the citywide comparison is for offices, their most filed type, where 1,360 of 26,216 permits went through plan review and the rest were approved over the counter.

Field Construction Inc., offices

4.2months

That is about the same as the citywide median for offices.

Median months from filing to issue for plan-review permits. Field Construction Inc., offices: 4.2 months. San Francisco, offices: 3.9 months. Middle half of city permits: 1.8 to 8.1 months.
4.2 months for offices, faster than 21 of 35 other contractors ranked for offices that have a median for it Each circle is a firm's median for its plan-review permits for offices. Dashed line: the median of all San Francisco plan-review permits for offices, 3.9 months. Shaded: the middle half of those permits, 1.8 to 8.1 months.
0 3 6 9+ months Novo Construction Inc: 5.1 months Skyline Construction: 5.3 months Bcci Construction Company: 5.1 months Gci, Inc: 5.5 months Peacock Construction: 10.9 months Bilcor Inc: 1.4 months Principal Builders Inc.: 4.7 months Hathaway Dinwiddie Co.: 4.4 months Sabah International Incorporated: 1.4 months Richlen Construction: 5.3 months Pribuss Engineering Inc: 1.3 months Dpr Construction: 7.6 months Swinerton Builders: 3.4 months Dome Construction Corp: 6.2 months Convergint Technologies Llc: 3.8 months Truebeck Construction: 4.0 months Plant Construction Co, Lp: 4.2 months Bevilacqua & Sons: 2.6 months Rossi Builders Inc.: 5.5 months Webcor Construction Lp: 3.9 months Clune Construction Company L P: 4.3 months Turner Construction Co: 6.1 months Intelligent Technologies & Services Inc: 1.1 months Mastec Network Solutions Inc: 5.1 months Build Group Inc.: 4.8 months Charles Pankow Builders Ltd: 3.5 months Brennan Strong Hold Construction Inc: 5.6 months Level 10 Construction Lp: 5.7 months Nibbi Bros Assoc Inc.: 5.1 months Granite Excavation & Demolition Inc: 11.5 months Ewsf Inc.: 2.4 months Cahill Contractors Llc.: 3.6 months Bobcomm Llc Dba Pacific Das Llc.: 3.3 months Zack De Vito Inc: 12.3 months Clear Channel Outdoor Llc: 2.6 months Field Construction Inc. 0 3 6 9+ months Novo Construction Inc: 5.1 months Skyline Construction: 5.3 months Bcci Construction Company: 5.1 months Gci, Inc: 5.5 months Peacock Construction: 10.9 months Bilcor Inc: 1.4 months Principal Builders Inc.: 4.7 months Hathaway Dinwiddie Co.: 4.4 months Sabah International Incorporated: 1.4 months Richlen Construction: 5.3 months Pribuss Engineering Inc: 1.3 months Dpr Construction: 7.6 months Swinerton Builders: 3.4 months Dome Construction Corp: 6.2 months Convergint Technologies Llc: 3.8 months Truebeck Construction: 4.0 months Plant Construction Co, Lp: 4.2 months Bevilacqua & Sons: 2.6 months Rossi Builders Inc.: 5.5 months Webcor Construction Lp: 3.9 months Clune Construction Company L P: 4.3 months Turner Construction Co: 6.1 months Intelligent Technologies & Services Inc: 1.1 months Mastec Network Solutions Inc: 5.1 months Build Group Inc.: 4.8 months Charles Pankow Builders Ltd: 3.5 months Brennan Strong Hold Construction Inc: 5.6 months Level 10 Construction Lp: 5.7 months Nibbi Bros Assoc Inc.: 5.1 months Granite Excavation & Demolition Inc: 11.5 months Ewsf Inc.: 2.4 months Cahill Contractors Llc.: 3.6 months Bobcomm Llc Dba Pacific Das Llc.: 3.3 months Zack De Vito Inc: 12.3 months Clear Channel Outdoor Llc: 2.6 months Field Construction Inc.

3 firms with medians over 9 months are drawn at the right edge.

Where they rank

Ranked by permits the city has issued since 2018, first across every project type, then for offices alone.

  1. 14 Swinerton Builders 417
  2. 15 Gil Construction & Assoc Inc. 374
  3. 16 Field Construction Inc. 373
  4. 17 Terence Mcmahon Construction 367
  5. 18 Magnum Construction Group Inc 321

All permits issued, 226 contractors Full ranking

  1. 7 Principal Builders Inc. 587
  2. 8 Hathaway Dinwiddie Co. 499
  3. 9 Field Construction Inc. 334
  4. 10 Sabah International Incorporated 329
  5. 11 Richlen Construction 294

Offices issued, 94 contractors

Where they work

The neighborhoods where Field Construction Inc. files the most permits, and how many contractors count each one among their top 4 neighborhoods.

  1. 01 Financial District/South Beach 49 contractors count Financial District/South Beach among their busiest neighborhoods
  2. 02 South of Market 35 contractors count South of Market among their busiest neighborhoods
  3. 03 Chinatown 27 contractors count Chinatown among their busiest neighborhoods
  4. 04 Mission 86 contractors count Mission among their busiest neighborhoods

Questions for the first call

  1. Which of your recent San Francisco permits are closest to my project in type, size and neighborhood, and can I see the permit numbers?
  2. How long did those permits take from filing to issue, and what did plan check send back?
  3. Who on your team draws the set, who stamps it, and who answers the city's comments?

Other contractors for offices

Firms ranked near Field Construction Inc. by permits issued for offices.

  1. 6 Bilcor Inc 602 offices issued · 1.4 mo median for offices
  2. 7 Principal Builders Inc. 587 offices issued · 4.7 mo median for offices
  3. 8 Hathaway Dinwiddie Co. 499 offices issued · 4.4 mo median for offices
  4. 10 Sabah International Incorporated 329 offices issued · 1.4 mo median for offices
  5. 11 Richlen Construction 294 offices issued · 5.3 mo median for offices
  6. 12 Pribuss Engineering Inc 210 offices issued · 1.3 mo median for offices
Sheet
C-016 No. 16 of 226
Drawing
Permit record, Field Construction Inc.
Contractor, San Francisco
License
306094 check with CSLB
Data as of
Oct 2026
Scale
Not to scale

Built only from public San Francisco Department of Building Inspection records (permits, permit contacts), updated 2026-10-20. It is not a review or an endorsement, and Field Construction Inc. has not paid to be listed. Project addresses are never shown.

Is this your firm? Claim it or send a correction.