Skip to content
Bay Area Architect Architects ranked by permits
Who to call firstWho to call

Contractor, San Francisco License 995375

Plant Construction Co, Lp

The city has issued 307 of the 326 San Francisco building permits that name Plant Construction Co, Lp since 2018. The work is mostly commercial, led by offices. Their median plan-review permit for offices took 4.2 months from filing to issue, about the same as the citywide median. Their busiest neighborhoods are Financial District/South Beach, Chinatown and Mission.

Also filed as
architect, designer
Issued by the city
307 of 326 filed since 2018
Median plan-review time, offices
4.2 mo city median 3.9 mo
Rank for offices
No. 19 of 94 by offices issued
Overall rank
No. 23 of 226 contractors

What they work on

Every San Francisco building permit with Plant Construction Co, Lp on the record since 2018, by project type. Most filed: 138 offices, 85 hotels, clinics, schools and other commercial, 61 apartments and multifamily.

Residential and commercial, by permits filed

20% residential
80% commercial
Permits by project type, filed and issued
  1. Offices Commercial 129 of 138 issued 42% of filings.
  2. Hotels, clinics, schools and other commercial Commercial 79 of 85 issued 26% of filings.
  3. Apartments and multifamily Residential 59 of 61 issued 19% of filings.
  4. Retail and shops Commercial 28 of 28 issued 9% of filings.
  5. Restaurants and bars Commercial 8 of 9 issued 3% of filings.
  6. Home remodels Residential 4 of 5 issued 2% of filings.

Permits over time

Permits filed each year, drawn as a street with one building per year, and how many of all their permits the city has issued.

Busiest year
2018
55 permits filed
Latest filing
Sep 2026
94% of 326 issued
Permits filed per year: 2018: 55, 2019: 34, 2020: 26, 2021: 35, 2022: 51, 2023: 34, 2024: 39, 2025: 30, 2026: 22. The 2026 figure runs through October 20, 2026.

One building per year, its height the permits filed. Each floor line marks 10 permits; the 2026 building is dashed because it counts permits filed through October 20, 2026.

Issued by the city: 307 of 326 permits filed

94%

All San Francisco project permits since 2018 in this data

93% issued

19 not issued as of October 20, 2026. Source: SF Department of Building Inspection permits via DataSF.

How fast their permits come through

Filing to issue for permits that went through plan review. Plant Construction Co, Lp has 94 of those across all project types; the citywide comparison is for offices, their most filed type, where 1,360 of 26,216 permits went through plan review and the rest were approved over the counter.

Plant Construction Co, Lp, offices

4.2months

That is about the same as the citywide median for offices.

Median months from filing to issue for plan-review permits. Plant Construction Co, Lp, offices: 4.2 months. San Francisco, offices: 3.9 months. Middle half of city permits: 1.8 to 8.1 months.
4.2 months for offices, faster than 20 of 35 other contractors ranked for offices that have a median for it Each circle is a firm's median for its plan-review permits for offices. Dashed line: the median of all San Francisco plan-review permits for offices, 3.9 months. Shaded: the middle half of those permits, 1.8 to 8.1 months.
0 3 6 9+ months Novo Construction Inc: 5.1 months Skyline Construction: 5.3 months Bcci Construction Company: 5.1 months Gci, Inc: 5.5 months Peacock Construction: 10.9 months Bilcor Inc: 1.4 months Principal Builders Inc.: 4.7 months Hathaway Dinwiddie Co.: 4.4 months Field Construction Inc.: 4.2 months Sabah International Incorporated: 1.4 months Richlen Construction: 5.3 months Pribuss Engineering Inc: 1.3 months Dpr Construction: 7.6 months Swinerton Builders: 3.4 months Dome Construction Corp: 6.2 months Convergint Technologies Llc: 3.8 months Truebeck Construction: 4.0 months Bevilacqua & Sons: 2.6 months Rossi Builders Inc.: 5.5 months Webcor Construction Lp: 3.9 months Clune Construction Company L P: 4.3 months Turner Construction Co: 6.1 months Intelligent Technologies & Services Inc: 1.1 months Mastec Network Solutions Inc: 5.1 months Build Group Inc.: 4.8 months Charles Pankow Builders Ltd: 3.5 months Brennan Strong Hold Construction Inc: 5.6 months Level 10 Construction Lp: 5.7 months Nibbi Bros Assoc Inc.: 5.1 months Granite Excavation & Demolition Inc: 11.5 months Ewsf Inc.: 2.4 months Cahill Contractors Llc.: 3.6 months Bobcomm Llc Dba Pacific Das Llc.: 3.3 months Zack De Vito Inc: 12.3 months Clear Channel Outdoor Llc: 2.6 months Plant Construction Co, Lp 0 3 6 9+ months Novo Construction Inc: 5.1 months Skyline Construction: 5.3 months Bcci Construction Company: 5.1 months Gci, Inc: 5.5 months Peacock Construction: 10.9 months Bilcor Inc: 1.4 months Principal Builders Inc.: 4.7 months Hathaway Dinwiddie Co.: 4.4 months Field Construction Inc.: 4.2 months Sabah International Incorporated: 1.4 months Richlen Construction: 5.3 months Pribuss Engineering Inc: 1.3 months Dpr Construction: 7.6 months Swinerton Builders: 3.4 months Dome Construction Corp: 6.2 months Convergint Technologies Llc: 3.8 months Truebeck Construction: 4.0 months Bevilacqua & Sons: 2.6 months Rossi Builders Inc.: 5.5 months Webcor Construction Lp: 3.9 months Clune Construction Company L P: 4.3 months Turner Construction Co: 6.1 months Intelligent Technologies & Services Inc: 1.1 months Mastec Network Solutions Inc: 5.1 months Build Group Inc.: 4.8 months Charles Pankow Builders Ltd: 3.5 months Brennan Strong Hold Construction Inc: 5.6 months Level 10 Construction Lp: 5.7 months Nibbi Bros Assoc Inc.: 5.1 months Granite Excavation & Demolition Inc: 11.5 months Ewsf Inc.: 2.4 months Cahill Contractors Llc.: 3.6 months Bobcomm Llc Dba Pacific Das Llc.: 3.3 months Zack De Vito Inc: 12.3 months Clear Channel Outdoor Llc: 2.6 months Plant Construction Co, Lp

3 firms with medians over 9 months are drawn at the right edge.

Where they rank

Ranked by permits the city has issued since 2018, first across every project type, then for offices alone.

  1. 21 Sft Construction Corp 311
  2. 22 Ps2 Inc 310
  3. 23 Plant Construction Co, Lp 307
  4. 24 Pribuss Engineering Inc 304
  5. 25 Everon Llc 285

All permits issued, 226 contractors Full ranking

  1. 17 Convergint Technologies Llc 159
  2. 18 Truebeck Construction 157
  3. 19 Plant Construction Co, Lp 129
  4. 20 C C I Commercial Construction & Improv 122
  5. 21 Bevilacqua & Sons 102

Offices issued, 94 contractors

Where they work

The neighborhoods where Plant Construction Co, Lp files the most permits, and how many contractors count each one among their top 4 neighborhoods.

  1. 01 Financial District/South Beach 49 contractors count Financial District/South Beach among their busiest neighborhoods
  2. 02 Chinatown 27 contractors count Chinatown among their busiest neighborhoods
  3. 03 Mission 86 contractors count Mission among their busiest neighborhoods
  4. 04 Tenderloin 20 contractors count Tenderloin among their busiest neighborhoods

Questions for the first call

  1. Which of your recent San Francisco permits are closest to my project in type, size and neighborhood, and can I see the permit numbers?
  2. How long did those permits take from filing to issue, and what did plan check send back?
  3. Who on your team draws the set, who stamps it, and who answers the city's comments?

Other contractors for offices

Firms ranked near Plant Construction Co, Lp by permits issued for offices.

  1. 16 Everon Llc 191 offices issued
  2. 17 Convergint Technologies Llc 159 offices issued · 3.8 mo median for offices
  3. 18 Truebeck Construction 157 offices issued · 4.0 mo median for offices
  4. 20 C C I Commercial Construction & Improv 122 offices issued
  5. 21 Bevilacqua & Sons 102 offices issued · 2.6 mo median for offices
  6. 22 Rossi Builders Inc. 102 offices issued · 5.5 mo median for offices
Sheet
C-023 No. 23 of 226
Drawing
Permit record, Plant Construction Co, Lp
Contractor, San Francisco
License
995375 check with CSLB
Data as of
Oct 2026
Scale
Not to scale

Built only from public San Francisco Department of Building Inspection records (permits, permit contacts), updated 2026-10-20. It is not a review or an endorsement, and Plant Construction Co, Lp has not paid to be listed. Project addresses are never shown.

Is this your firm? Claim it or send a correction.